
JLL’s Q1 2024 Thought Leadership Paper, “The Value of Solar PV in Real Estate,” explores how the shift to renewable energy is reshaping property valuation, ownership models, and investor decision-making. It’s one of the clearest attempts yet to connect the dots between energy performance and asset value.
The report touches on the opportunity for solar PV, ownership structures, and emerging market behaviour – but its most valuable contribution is the guidance it gives on valuation methodology.
JLL makes a strong case for treating solar PV as a distinct income-producing asset rather than simply an “extra line” in a property cash flow.
It recommends using a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) approach to model PV income, expenses, and risks separately from the core real estate, reflecting its unique performance drivers such as output, energy prices, and maintenance costs.
A crucial point JLL makes – and one that valuers often overlook – is how to combine the PV value with the property value.
When a solar installation produces its own monetisable income stream (for example, power sold to tenants under a PPA or exported to the grid), the Net Present Value of that income can be added to the property’s capital value.
However, if the benefit of PV is already captured elsewhere – such as through higher rents, improved marketability, or reduced voids – then the uplift is already “baked into” the property’s yield assumptions.
In that case, adding the PV NPV on top would double count the benefit.
JLL’s framework therefore calls for two complementary steps:
In short:
PV can absolutely add value to a building – but only when it generates distinct, traceable cash flow beyond the base property income.
JLL’s examples illustrate how this plays out:
| Scenario | Ownership | Discount Rate | IRR | Outcome |
| Landlord-owned PV | Landlord invests and sells energy | 7.5% | 13.3% | Payback ~8 years, adds ~6% to total asset value |
| Third-party-owned PV (roof rent) | Landlord leases roof, no capex | 6.0% | n/a | Generates modest additional income at lower risk |
Rather than prescribing discount rates, JLL urges valuers to apply rates consistent with the specific risk exposure – typically higher than core property yields but lower than merchant energy projects.
For property owners, investors, and valuers, this framework helps bridge a growing gap between sustainability ambition and valuation practice.
With ESG credentials, tenant demand, and operational energy costs now influencing liquidity and pricing, understanding how to quantify the financial impact of solar PV is becoming a competitive advantage.
As JLL notes, assets that cannot host or integrate solar PV are already beginning to face value and liquidity risk – particularly in markets where PV readiness is becoming a baseline underwriting assumption.
Solar PV isn’t just an environmental feature – it’s a financial variable that affects income, valuation, and investor perception.
To capture its true contribution:
Doing this brings greater transparency, consistency, and confidence to ESG-aligned valuation – and moves the market one step closer to truly pricing sustainability into real estate.
© 2025 R2G LIMITED. All rights reserved | Website by Creativefive | Company number: 15826171 | Registered address: The Office, Gothic House, Barker Gate, Nottingham NG1 1JU | info@r2g.co.uk